“I was charged with annoying with intent to annoy…”


And they all moved away from me on the bench…

[Special gold stars for anyone who remembers where that lyric came from.]

Last August, there was a rally in Northern Ireland. To date, four people have been charged with violating the hate speech law which has a pretty low threshold:

Belfast Telegraph:

He faces two counts of using threatening, abusive or insulting words. He is alleged to have intended to stir up hatred or arouse fear by his comments, according to the police case.

I bring this up because the three words which seem to form the basis of the Northern Irish law are threatening, abusive and insulting. Do those things and you’re in a pickle.

On Hogewash!, John Hoge wrote about a proposed update to a Maryland law which uses the following wording:

A person may not:

maliciously engage in a course of conduct, through the use of electronic communication, that alarms or seriously annoys another:  with the intent to harass, alarm, or annoy the other…

This is how hate legislation happens. Can we all agree that the Irish law should have threatening as a factor? Sure. And in Maryland there should be some kind of protection from harassment? Absolutely.

 How about the other terms, from the two jurisdictions:

abusive

insulting

that alarms…

that seriously annoys…

with intent to…alarm or annoy

There just can’t be a lot of people who seriously think anyone should face criminal court for annoying or alarming another person, even if their intent was to annoy or alarm.

If I’m wrong, please plan to be awfully nice to people in Maryland and Northern Ireland. And anywhere else where this fascist kind of word control takes over.

Plan on seeing your Tweets on 27 eight by ten color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Alt-left, extremist progressives, far-left, jackbooted censors of the left, Anything You Want, Free Speech, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “I was charged with annoying with intent to annoy…”

  1. gmhowell says:

    You wanna know if I’m moral enough to shoot kids and rape fathers after I posted dank memes?

    On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:18 PM The Artisan Craft Blog — Dave Alexander & Company with David Edgren and Gus Bailey wrote:

    > Dave Alexander (formerly ukuleledave) posted: ” And they all moved away > from me on the bench… [Special gold stars for anyone who remembers where > that lyric came from.] Last August, there was a rally in Northern Ireland. > To date, four people have been charged with violating the hate speech law > which” >

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Alice’s Restaurant Massacree with the five part harmony and full orchestration.

    Like

  3. agiledog says:

    I make an effort to play that song every Thanksgiving.

    Bill Schmalfelt called my house and sent me emails with the intent to annoy, insult, alarm, and intimidate. I have never called him, and all my emails to him have been replies to his emails, which included the statement to cease contacting me. Does that mean I can get him charged with a crime?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s