An Oaf’s Shoes


This came after this tweet.


The excerpt in the tweet about Sarah Palmer is from a Texas case decided in 1984: Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc. v. Buck, 678 S.W.2d 612 (Tex. App. 1984)2.  I won’t spend any time distinguishing the fact pattern in the case from the instant facts Our Oaf believes are at issue in his current federal case or tell you why I believe Hall is completely without any precedential value because it just isn’t worth the time- yours or mine.

That’s because… Wow!  Some fat targets here.

Let’s start with the DSM-III, all the iterations of which have been superseded since the publication of the DSM-IV in 19943.  The DSM-III was the first iteration of this mental health diagnostic manual to discard the previously used terms sociopath and psychopath in favor of the classification of such conditions as antisocial personality disorder4. The DSM-III was first published in 1980, three years after the events occurred that gave rise to the Hall litigation.  So, from a diagnostic standpoint, the terms sociopath and psychopath have not been used for over 35 years.  There is no doubt, at least in my mind, that the terms still carry heavy-duty negative connotations, but they are connotations within lay parlance5.  In any event Bill Schmalfeldt is simply wrong when he says “Sociopathy requires a DSM-III diagnosis.”

“Hey, wait a minute!,” you exclaim.  Our Oaf hasn’t said anything about psychopaths, right?  Aren’t we just dealing with his mischaracterization of the term sociopath here?  Well, apparently in the world of antisocial personality disorders there is really no current distinction between the two for the purposes of making a mental health diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder6.  The Houser paper quotes a source as saying that

It has been shown that people diagnosed with psychopathy means that the individual has no sense of morality or empathy amongst other traits, whereas people diagnosed with sociopathy do have a sense of morality and a conscience, but their morals do not reflect the culture in which they live7.


So maybe Schmalfeldt is on to something after all. If the distinction in the quote is valid, shouldn’t Palmer have properly deemed him to be a “frustrated psychopath” instead of a “frustrated sociopath?” Being of an inquisitive mind, I set out to see.

In 1995 a psychology researcher, Michael R. Levenson, developed and and published the “Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale,8” which is a research tool designed for the lay public to self-administer and report in assessing where an individual fits on two axes: primary psychopathy (psychopathic emotional affect) and secondary psychopathy (psychopathic lifestyle) measured against the entire population of persons who have done the same.  This test instrument is available in an online interactive version9.  I followed the link and this came up.


Aha! I thought.  It really doesn’t matter whether Sarah Palmer thinks whether Our Oaf is a sociopath, a psychopath or whatever.  It doesn’t matter what I think.  Because, through the magic of paying attention, we can pretty much know what Bill Schmalfeldt thinks.  Yes, oh yes we can.  We can because the test is based on 26 pretty cut and dried questions and we have a ton of information about where Schmalfeldt would come down on each one.

So I held my nose and…


…stepped into Bill Schmalfeldt’s Birkenstocks.

Clicking on the “Start” button, the first thing we saw were the 26 questions.


We answered them based on everything I knew about The Oaf gleaned from more than a decade of his online postings.  I tried hard not to let my personal feelings color the answers I chose, and where I was truly unsure of an answer I tried to give the benefit of the doubt.  For most of the questions, though, the answer was immediately apparent, at least to me10.


I clicked “Submit” and held my breath.  This page appeared.


On Bill’s behalf11, I clicked “Yes” twice and hit “Continue.”


This page came up.  I didn’t think Bill would be interested in the new project, so we hit “Get results.”


We moved through a page where we entered Bill’s age, which I understand to be 62.


At last, the results.  According to the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale and presuming my answers standing in Bill Schmalfeldt’s shoes were accurate12, the test says that, on the “Primary psychopathy” scale he scored a 4.3 out of 5.  On the “Secondary psychopathy” scale he scored a 4.5.  The page explains what these axes represent.


At the bottom of the page these scores were plotted against the overall population of takers of the test.  I have enlarged this plot and added a “+” marker to show where Bill Schmalfeldt came out in relation to everyone else.  As is noted, his score for primary psychopathy is greater than 93% of all test takers.  His score for secondary psychopathy, which is the measure of “the antisocial aspects of psychopathy,” approaches the 99th percentile.


Can I say, based on this exercise, which was not done as a scientific undertaking and was not intended in any way to substitute for formal evaluation of Bill Schmalfeldt by qualified skilled mental health professionals, that Bill Schmalfeldt is a psychopath? No. Why? I could be wrong in the answers I gave while in his shoes, and probably was, although as I noted, I did my best to give honest answers supported by all the evidence I have available. Beyond that, though, it just isn’t for me to say. It is plenty for me to have concluded that Schmalfeldt is an Oaf, a lout and a jerk. But here’s the results of a test, which Bill Schmalfeldt is welcome to seek to refute if he chooses. You are likewise welcome to reach your own conclusions.

David Edgren

1 The DSM V was published in 2013.  It takes about 1.3 seconds of Internet research to figure that out.

2 The opinion is online at

3 A Southern Illinois University Master’s candidate’s graduate research paper: Houser, Mallory C. “A HISTORY OF ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER IN THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND TREATMENT FROM A REHABILITATION PERSPECTIVE.” (Apr 2015), published online, while not a classic “learned treatise,” presents some helpful info in a very accessible form, and I cite to it in this post as a result:

4 Houser, p. 5.  With further refinements the DSM IV and V continued to use antisocial personality disorder as a diagnostic term.

5 Like calling someone an “idiot” or a “moron,” both of which used to be formal mental health diagnoses.

6 “Today, psychopathy and sociopathy lay within the realm of antisocial personality disorder even though many push for them to have separate diagnoses again, or to at least be understood as two completely different disorders.” Id.

7 Houser, p. 5, citing Pemment, J. (2013) Psychopathy versus sociopathy: Why the distinction has become crucial. Aggression and Violent Behavior 18, 458-461.

8 Levenson M., Kiehl K., Fitzpatrick C. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158.


10 While I don’t seek to interact in any way with Bill Schmalfeldt and have no idea whether he will ever even read this, in the interest of being fair-minded (and unless Dave, the boss here, objects), if he would disagree with any particular answer I would have given in his stead, he is allowed in the comments here to both ask about my reasoning in providing the answer and provide the answer he would give so long as he gives a brief explanation of why he would take exception. He needs to play nice and otherwise follow Dave’s rules, but we’ll let him take his best shot at demonstrating my answer wasn’t right.

11 Please note that nowhere while taking the test was Bill Schmalfeldt’s name, or anyone’s name for that matter, associated with taking the test except for in this blog post. The process provides for complete anonymity of the person being tested.

12 They were certainly truthful, at least by my lights. I would believe I can produce at least three distinct items of documentation that would support every “1” or “5” response I provided to the various questions.




This entry was posted in Psychopathy, Sociopathy, Stupid and Evil, The Oaf. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to An Oaf’s Shoes

  1. gmhowell says:

    I could quibble about a few of your choices, but not enough to move the pointer out of Abby Normal on either axis.

    On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:37 AM The Artisan Craft Blog — Dave Alexander & Company with David Edgren and Gus Bailey wrote:

    > D. Edgren posted: ” This came after this tweet. The excerpt in the tweet > about Sarah Palmer is from a Texas case decided in 1984: Frank B. Hall & > Co., Inc. v. Buck, 678 S.W.2d 612 (Tex. App. 1984)2. I won’t spend any > time distinguishing the fact pattern in the case” >

    Liked by 1 person

  2. lorddewclaw says:


    It is my firm opinion that if Fatboy were ever assessed, he would be found to have multiple psychiatric issues.

    I mean… who behaves in a way to get a restraining order from a three year old?

    Liked by 6 people

  3. crawford421 says:

    Another point of data — most people to through life without getting a single court order against them. To get 13 no-contact orders for largely the same behavior shows a distinct inability to learn.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. DeplorableRican says:

    OMG what a freaking moron Sara is NOT an MD nor a psychiatrist, all she can do is offer an layman’s opinion. Further she has NEVER said that he Creeper was officially diagnosed as sociopath


  5. Techno Jinxx says:

    that was more scientific than most of “man caused climate change” research is.

    but lets be blunt, Shakey will never willingly volunteer to take such a test, or be examined by a qualified psychiatrist for one simple reason.

    once he is proved to be a socio/psych path, he can no longer claim that who call him one are defaming him.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I actually fill out things like the form above. Sometimes I have to write in an extra bubble just to fill it in. I would do that for Bill. “I find myself in the same kinds of trouble…”

    The word AGREE does not seem to do it. Should be a column of dots with Hell Yeah! above.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Adriane says:

    “Are you nuttier than a slice of crunchy peanut butter pie?” was not one of he questions. I’m shocked, shocked!

    Liked by 1 person

    • D. Edgren says:

      I was shocked, shocked by J.K. Rowling’s inclusion of the line “Nuttier than squirrel poo” in one of the Harry Potter books. Oh, and that remark by Ron Weasley about Uranus.


  8. Took the test, and, as expected, wound up in the lower left quadrant.

    They ask age and sex so they don’t confuse “grumpy old bastard” with “psychopath”, is my guess…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s