The Right to Be Forgotten?

 Eugene Volokh discusses a proposal in New York to give people the right to have certain statements about them deleted from the internet if they are deemed ‘inaccurate,’ ‘irrelevant,’ ‘inadequate’ or ‘excessive.’

But the deeper problem with the bill is simply that it aims to censor what people say, under a broad, vague test based on what the government thinks the public should or shouldn’t be discussing. It is clearly unconstitutional under current First Amendment law, and I hope First Amendment law will stay that way (no matter what rules other countries might have adopted).

Remember: There is no “right to be forgotten” in the abstract; no law can ensure that, and no law can be limited to that. Instead, the “right” this aims to protect is the power to suppress speech — the power to force people (on pain of financial ruin) to stop talking about other people, when some government body decides that they should stop.

These new ‘rights’ are a real problem. The right to not be offended. The right to expect safe spaces. The right to never confront evil, or face emotional discomfort.  The right to violent action to prevent a presentation with which you disagree. The right to demand that others use proper pronouns and descriptive words to describe you.  The right to self-identify as Native American, black, male or female — regardless of clear contradictory evidence.


Whatchu talkin’ about, Willis?

 Oh, and the right to show another citizen’s tax returns on TV without permission.

 That’s crap.

This entry was posted in Free Speech, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Right to Be Forgotten?

  1. onwyrdsdream says:

    Pointless. Any piece of data can be transformed an infinite number of ways for re-transmission. you can break a file into data which is completely random looking, but when you have enough pieces a computer can reassemble the original though a mathematical transformation. Encryption exists that could never be decrypted without the key, since every transformation of the data is equally likely. data can be payloaded with other data. You may be able to get things off the WWW. But don’t expect that it actually keeps it away from any eyes. In the end it might bring it before even more.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. agiledog says:

    As Mr. Volokh said, the point of the proposed law is to give people (mostly powerful or rich people, working through the government) the ability to tell other people when to stop talking about them.

    There really should be some kind of direct penalty for lawmakers who file such unconstitutional crap. It is a sad statement about the American voters that such legislators get re-elected.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s