The Only Instance of Shia Labeouf Ever Being Intimidating


Now, the counter protester must be even shorter than Labeouf plus his hat, so we’re not talking about an imposing figure. Labeouf and his peace loving activists are bullies in the cause of…not Trump.

All the things they are against, they flip to in a second.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Presidential Politics, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Only Instance of Shia Labeouf Ever Being Intimidating

  1. onwyrdsdream says:

    For a collectivist, imposing the will of the collective is a virtue and opposing it is a sin.

    Like

  2. Paul Krendler says:

    So far since Friday, I have seen video or read published news stories of the “LOVE TRUMPS HATE” tolerant Left protesters…

    1. Setting cars on fire
    2. Smashing windows
    3. sucker punching Richard Spencer (and facilitating the assailant’s getaway)
    4. punching a reporter from TheRebel.com (and facilitating the assailants getaway)
    5. setting a woman’s hair on fire (and facilitating the assailant’s getaway)
    6. shooting a counter-protester, leaving him in critical condition, because the shooter thought his victim “was a white supremacist” but actually turned out to be a Bernie Sanders supporter.

    Because remember…it’s the right-wing, gun -loving militia types that are the dangerous ones.

    Like

  3. Gus Bailey says:

    How is that not assault?

    Yup; thought so:
    Washington, D.C. Criminal Code:

    Assault: Section 22-404

    First, DC Code Section 22-404 covers “assault or threatened assault in a menacing manner.” this crime is a misdemeanor that covers anyone who intentionally causes or attempts to cause harmful or unwanted contact to another person. It also covers anyone who threatens such assault in a manner that gives the threatened person a reasonable belief of imminent harm or unwanted contact. The penalty is a fine up to $1,000, up to 180 days in jail, or both. Section 22-3571.01.

    It doesn’t mention if each instance is an offense. I think in view of Mr. LeBeuf’s probably financial status the 180 days is appropriate.

    Like

  4. crawford421 says:

    Yeah, I’d have been backing away from that nutcase with my hand on my pistol.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s