How Quickly People Want to Make Rules for Speech


This involves the American preacher Steven Anderson who said some pretty nasty things after the nightclub shooting in Orlando.  He’s been stopped from visiting South Africa.  South Africa can certainly bar him from their soil without my permission.  This essay show how far folks will go on the subject of “hate speech.” 

Religious freedom and free speech by Victor VanHeerden, News 24:

For a change I am proud to be a South African, because the ANC regime, well known for committing own goals has got this one right, by banning bigot and homophobic Pastor Anderson from spewing forth his primitive convictions in person.  

[Sometimes folks in English speaking countries disagree on grammar.  I assume that first sentence makes sense to South Africans. – Dave]-snip-

 

Religious freedom and free speech should only be allowed if it produces consequences that engender love, peace and upliftment.  Pastor “know it all” not only bashed gays with hate speech he also insulted Desmond Tutu and others as well. Jolly good show Gigaba, we don’t need more hypocrites in this country creating chaos and spreading hatred as we already have enough of those in the ANC. 

People are of course entitled to believe whatever they want, but soon as they affect the world around them with obsolete, irrelevant ideas sourced from a, pre Newton, pre Copernicus, pre Darwin, pre Space age, book, one, must draw the line and bring them to task. 



“Religious freedom and free speech should only be allowed if it produces consequences that engender love, peace and upliftment.”

“…but soon as they affect the world around them…”

If that’s the standard, then freedom is on life support in South Africa.  Especially religious freedom.  I know a lot of Americans who would agree with the author’s statements — and usher in a new Dark Ages.  

For the record, hate is terrible.  Hate speech is terrible.  But when people start to choose what others will get to say, hear or read…this is dangerous ground.  

 

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “How Quickly People Want to Make Rules for Speech

  1. agiledog

    People are of course entitled to believe whatever they want, but soon as they affect the world around them with obsolete, irrelevant ideas sourced from a, pre Newton, pre Copernicus, pre Darwin, pre Space age, book, one, must draw the line and bring them to task.

    So that douche-nozzle doesn’t think there is anything of value from the Jewish, Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist religions? Only science can rule – there is no good or evil, no right or wrong, only science? Science, like the “atom is the smallest thing in the world and can not be further divided” science? Or the “Universe is slowing in its expansion” science? That always right, consensus driven, everyone agrees it is so science? Ummmm, Ok. Not.

    And hate is not terrible. Hurting others because of hate is terrible.

    Like

    Reply
    1. gmhowell

      Science, like phlogiston and phrenology.

      On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Dave Alexander & Company with David Edgren and Gus Bailey – The Artisan Craft Blog wrote:

      > agiledog commented: “”People are of course entitled to believe whatever > they want, but soon as they affect the world around them with obsolete, > irrelevant ideas sourced from a, pre Newton, pre Copernicus, pre Darwin, > pre Space age, book, one, must draw the line and bring them” >

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s