Shutuppery — With an Update (Fisking Bill)



Update: Bill Schmalfeldt has commented.  For the sake of simplicity I’ll comment below — so everything is chronological.  I’ll give you a hint:  He’s wrong, I’m right and I can prove it.


Lately I’ve been writing about Shutuppery.

Shutuppery is the practice of shouting down or punishing those who dare write something controversial. I got involved in this when an internet troll named Bill Schmalfeldt published a Google maps picture of my house, some publicly available documents about me, and my photo from Facebook. He wasn’t breaking the law, I suppose. He just wanted me to stop writing about him.  Oh yeah.  He also wanted me to inform on my fellow commenters at Hogewash.  He wanted their real names and IP addresses. Jerk.

.Now, I didn’t pick some random guy out of the phone book and start writing about him. Here’s a post about my interaction with Bill Schmalfeldt. Of course you could just Google him.

His latest tactic is to threaten lawsuits against folks who use his likeness or his name without permission. He expects some other writers to negotiate a licensing agreement for the use of his name. On behalf of all non-fiction writers, I must respond: Bill Schmalfeldt, no. Never.

Krendler/Grady needs to contact me so we can set up a licensing agreement for the use of my name and image. No license, no permission. – Tweet by Bill Schmalfeldt, 5/23/2015

Bill Schmalfeldt, who writes internet virtual pron about Cub Scouts, harasses people with such regularity that he has had 5 Peace Orders/Anti-stalking Orders written against him. (The orders are called different things in different states. Basically a handful of regular folks have convinced judge that Bill Schmalfeldt needs to leave them the hell alone.)


And now, some more from the Shutuppery Files:

Sister Toljah takes on the inventors of the so-called “rape culture.
Feminists have even gone so far as to accuse those in favor (gasp!) of due process for college men accused of sexual assaults of being “pro-rape”, while at the same time suggesting that the “default” position for anyone listening to a woman accuse a man of rape is to believe it without question. In other words, guilty until proven innocent.
I feel an obligation to say that I do not condone rape, micro-aggression, sexism, violence against women/by women. Apparently I’m obligated to write this since otherwise I might be accused of heinous thoughts.  (Heh.  Heinous rhymes with….nevermind.)
Finally, some books I’d love to read soon. I can’t say I’d agree with both authors, but here’s a review of So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed by Ron Johnson John Ronson and Hate Crimes in Cyberspace by Danielle Keats Citron.  Without reading either book, I can’t offer much of an opinion, but hate crimes in not a phrase I like to see.  The Ministry of Truth should work on a better term.

(Fixed the name for the author of So You’ve Been…  He’s Jon Ronson. 5/27/15 3:52p)

Update on 5/27/2015 at 10:22:

Bill Sez:
I have never threatened a lawsuit against someone who uses my name or image without permission. I stated the Restatement (Second) of Torts says in § 365 (I believe) that we each have our own right of publicity. If people want to write about me, that’s fine. All I ask is that it be true. If you use my image, you need my permission. That’s the law, junior. You have fallen short in being truthful, so I’m afraid I am going to have to ask for a retraction.

The following is available at this link.  Random caps in the original:

YOU ARE HEREBY FORBIDDEN FROM USING MY NAME, MY LIKENESS, OR ANY OTHER INDICIA THAT YOUR READERS WILL UNDERSTAND REFER TO ME.
This takes effect immediately, is retroactive, and will be enforced in our instant lawsuit.

Argue with me if you like. But show this to a lawyer and save yourself some expensive trouble.

I will reciprocate by removing all reference to you, all likenesses of you, from my website.

I am a private person. I have the right to use my own name, my own likeness. You do not have that right to use my name and likeness without my permission, which I do not give.

I will await your response. If you have not removed all references to me, all uses of my name, all images of me from your website by our motions hearing on June 3, I will amend my complaint to include this fact and will ask for significant damages for the two years you have abused my name and image.

Bill, you’re busted.  You threatened someone that using your image/name would be ADDED to an existing case.  Same thing as suing.  Oh, and if I have to drag out all the many hints that you’re gonna sue us all, I will.  And don’t call me junior.

Bill Sez:I have never written virtual ANYTHING about Cub Scouts.

Wrong. I own a copy of the hateful, disgusting comedy clip. If you want to argue that you wrote and performed an audio comedy virtual porn act about BOY Scouts, and not CUB Scouts, the ages of the fictional boys in the recording is consistent with CUB Scouts. I’m sure most people would agree with my interpretation.

We all know you think it was funny, and that no actual children were involved.  Doesn’t matter.  It’s sick.

Bill Sez: While the number of Peace Orders and such is accurate,, you neglect to mention the lies people told to get those…

So, you are still complaining that Hoge said he wouldn’t press his case…and you didn’t know enough to show up for your court date?  Good God man.  Let it rest.  Either you got played like a cheap violin, or Hoge changed his mind.  If you really have/had five POs in 4 states, NOBODY will assume everybody else lied. It’s inconceivable.  And yes I know what that word means.

Bill Sez: Grady lied about my calling his employer and his wife — never did that. The Causeys said that I was a convicted domestic abuser. Never even charged with that. They also said I called his wife and employer. Never happened. Ask them for proof of these allegations before you publish defamatory lies,

I just reported the fact that you have all those POs. You think it’s ‘MY job to re-litigate all the cases that you’ve lost, just so I can write about you?   I suggest YOU appeal anything which was decided in error.   I really don’t need proof of the allegations.  The judges presumable already looked at the proof.

Bill Sez:  …because I’m not in the best of moods these days with scoundrels mocking my wife’s terminal illness. So please, double check your facts and issue the proper retractions and we’ll consider this matter concluded.  I’m sorry about your wife’s terminal illness.  I’m sorry she is a subject of discussion among people who dislike you so much.  I’m also sorry that you published intimate details of her illness along with pictures of her bra-less in a tank top. Nobody with any respect for the dignity of a loved one does that.

My sorrow is for her, not you.  When it suited you, you hid behind your disease.  Now it suits you to blame your sour moods on scoundrels mocking your wife’s terminal illness.  Get yourself to a qualified counselor.  Parkinson’s and depression have been linked.  Long term illness, grief and internet trolling are a very poor combination.  If you can get hFeatured imageelp, it may be the best thing for your wife.

And finally, a note about irony.  I wrote an article about Shutuppery.  It was all about how people use legal threats to stop people from writing.  You responded with legal threats.  Baseless legal threats designed to convince me to shut up.

No retraction.


Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

103 Responses to Shutuppery — With an Update (Fisking Bill)

  1. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    I would advise you to double-check your alleged facts before publishing defamatory falsehoods. I have never threatened a lawsuit against someone who uses my name or image without permission. I stated the Restatement (Second) of Torts says in § 365 (I believe) that we each have our own right of publicity. If people want to write about me, that’s fine. All I ask is that it be true. If you use my image, you need my permission. That’s the law, junior. You have fallen short in being truthful, so I’m afraid I am going to have to ask for a retraction. I have never written virtual ANYTHING about Cub Scouts. While the number of Peace Orders and such is accurate,, you neglect to mention the lies people told to get those… such as WJJ Hoge lying to a judge about how difficult it is to block someone on Twitter, then lying to me so I would stay home from his second appeal of a disapproved PO. Grady lied about my calling his employer and his wife — never did that. The Causeys said that I was a convicted domestic abuser. Never even charged with that. They also said I called his wife and employer. Never happened. Ask them for proof of these allegations before you publish defamatory lies, because I’m not in the best of moods these days with scoundrels mocking my wife’s terminal illness. So please, double check your facts and issue the proper retractions and we’ll consider this matter concluded.

    See how nice and polite I can be?

    Like

    • Gus Bailey says:

      I have never written virtual ANYTHING about Cub Scouts.

      So, it must have been an accurate portrayal of a REAL event?
      As for the “lies”, I’m pretty sure Bill had an opportunity to present a defense; why didn’t he?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Check your facts, Gussy.

        Like

      • Gus Bailey says:

        It’s Gus or Gustavos (but Bill is neither my priest nor my mother), and the facts in evidence are that Bill produced an audio ‘bit’ that included the description/portrayal of boy (cub) scouts being subjected to sexual abuse at the hands of their scout master. Whether he wrote it or recorded it on the fly doesn’t do much to defend his concept of boundaries. That it exists in a catalog that includes repeated detailed homo-erotic, anal fixative and coporphilial works only further indicts Bill Schmalfeldt’s character.

        Or is he denying that he did produce an audio ‘bit’ that included that content?

        Oh I nearly forgot the context. I seem to recall there was some apophasic (embrace the power of) and anti-Christian couching; much like Those movies where the bubbly blonde bimbo really didn’t order that pizza or really did have a leaky faucet… Yeah, just like that; simply a pretext for the heart of Bill’s little pornographic opus.

        Liked by 2 people

  2. D. Edgren says:

    Dave, if this is the quality of commenters you get here, I’m really going to have to rethink following your blog. Anyway…

    We could care less about Billy’s “right to publicity” over at Billy Sez. Bill Schmalfeldt picks on people he thinks he can bully. Shame on him.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Joe Smirnoff says:

    Dumbfuck is acting brave today…what a asshole!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. D. Edgren says:

    Dave, if this is the quality of commenters you get here, I’m really going to have to rethink following your blog. Anyway…

    We could care less about Billy’s “right to publicity” over at Billy Sez. Bill Schmalfeldt picks on people he thinks he can bully. Shame on him.

    * * * [ cut past here]

    Dave, I love your blog. This Spells “ukulele” right. I knew better. I hope That makes things OK.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Dave- the guy who wrote “So You’be Been Publicly Shamed” is Jon Ronson.

    Hi Bill! Good to see you are investing your time with your wife wisely!

    Be well!

    Liked by 3 people

  6. howarddearl says:

    Is walking the the rows of trucks REALLY considered in the line of sight?

    Asking for a friends.

    Like

  7. Ashterah says:

    Oh, lookie there. He wants you to retract! Isn’t that speshul?

    Not. Happening. Billy-boy! Go pound sand.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Nil inultum remanebit. says:

    No discussion of shutuppery would be complete without mentioning the left-wing nutroots’ favored tactic of exploiting flaws in Twitter’s abuse reporting algorithms to shut down the accounts of people with whom they disagree.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. Father Paul Lemmen says:

    Reblogged this on A Conservative Christian Man.

    Like

  10. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Again, you will want to ensure that every word you write about me is verifiable and true. This is not a threat. This is a notice that I am not going to sit here and let thugs like you run wild with lies about me. You are on notice. Have a lovely weekend.

    Like

    • Kyle Kiernan says:

      I am informed that Schmalfeldt may in fact be a massive squidlike organism with many and various penile attachments on the ends of his prehensile and aggressive tentacles and he rampages about the streets of Elkridge on many a sunny Sunday afternoon impregnating dogs.
      Notice taken.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Army Vet says:

    It’s interesting that Bill is demanding a retraction for truthful things you wrote when his buddy Bunny Boy and Wee Willie Fergie have refused to retract the bold faced lies they have told about Mr. Hoge on Brietbart Unmasked. But then again, anything written there is either a copy paste from somewhere else or a lie. I guess Bill did leave a legacy after all. Really shitty reporting and editing at a seldom read blog.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Edgren, being an attorney, you should know better. I own that image. You do not. Cease and Desist.
    Also, YOU will want to make sure that every word you write about me is verifiable and true. If you express an opinion that can be disproved by a careful fact check, that does not protect you from libel.This is a very stressful time for me, and you are intentionally making things worse. Again. Cease and Desist or I will be forced to use my legal rights to protect my right to privacy and publicity.

    Thank you

    Like

    • agiledog says:

      You are such a complete piece of trash. We all enjoy annoying you because you are a menduecous twatwaffle.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Rob Crawford says:

      Your purported “stressful time” is immaterial. Even if it were, it would just be more evidence of YOUR poor behavior and that of the slime you hang around with.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Ashterah says:

      You tweeted it. You lost the right to control it as a result of their TOS. Deal with it with them buddy-boy.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Gus Bailey says:

      What do the shrinks call someone who seeks out stressors?

      I mean other than batshit crazy?

      Liked by 3 people

    • Ashterah says:

      I will repeat the words of the Dread Pirate Roberts. LIFE IS PAIN. Get used to it, Bill. Tough times abound for everyone. You will never know the stress any of us are under. Your pain is no more or less than any of ours, and you get NO special dispensation. You can no longer cry wolf because guess what? WE. DON’T. CARE.

      Liked by 5 people

  13. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Army Vet, I do not demand retractions of truthful things written about me. The fact that you BELIEVE them to be true does not MAKE them true. Your anonymity is scant protection, Ensure that every word you write about me is verifiably true. Otherwise, cease and desist.

    Like

    • Army Vet says:

      So you deny writing and recording anal rape scenarios about boy scouts? Do you deny lying about talking to a court clerk on Christmas Eve? There are a lot of your provable lies out there. You can’t duck them. YOU wrote them. YOU published them. YOU own them. BTW, why do you bitch about your address being published when you published Stranahans? Your defense was that the address was public record. So is yours. Care to explain that bit if hypocrisy? And keep in mind you published his after your good friend suggested people go to his house and rape his wife. That is also very well documented so lying about it does no good.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        I wrote a parody of a religious radio show outlining the evils of letting gay kids join the boy scouts to show how ridiculous the whole fear being whipped up by people like you was. It was a bit inside of a bit, designed to show the sheer nonsense of the argument. I know “context” gives you trouble, so if I can explain it clearer, let me know. I refuse to say one way or the other about the Christmas Eve Clerk because I know it annoys you. I am not bitching about my address being published. I’m bitching about the hypocrisy of people who published MY address bitching about being doxxed. Again, it’s that pesky “context” thing. What good friend suggested people go to his house and rape his wife? I have no idea who you are talking about. All I know is I did not suggest that anyone rape Stranahan, and he raised a shitload of money off of the lie, none of which he shared with me. Anything else I can help you with? Since we are still at “O” lies, you have quite the bar to surmount to get to “lots” of provable lies. Keep at it. How’s stuff in Cresson?

        Like

      • Gus Bailey says:

        Isn’t Bill the one who published his own address, which document was subsequently linked by others as reference to his stupidity?

        So which particular religious radio show was he “Parodying”? I wonder why Bill chose THAT particular theme???

        It’s still pornographic regardless of context; but speaking of context and Bill’s writing, it fits right in with the apophasis, pedophilia, pederasty, coprophilia, anal fixation and general molestation themes.

        You can tell a tree by the fruit it bears…

        Liked by 5 people

    • AJ says:

      Ask your boy Brett how it went for him when Judge Johnson held him to the actual standard of proof for defamation. You have to prove falsity, and that the alleged defamer knew it to be false, and that the statement is meant to be taken as a statement of fact.
      You can’t get over that first hurdle, any more than he could.

      Liked by 3 people

  14. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Gussy. I haven’t presented a defense because nobody has made a serious charge. They know better.

    Like

    • Gus Bailey says:

      Hey, y’all; how many peace/protective/restraining/no-contact/no-stalking orders does Bill Schmalfeldt have on his record? I lose count. How many did he mount a defense that was upheld?

      Liked by 2 people

  15. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Again, Gussy, you need to check your facts. This is just incorrect. Please identify the “bit” where anyone was subjected to sexual abuse by a scoutmaster. You’re relying on what you were told, not on what I actually wrote, and that leads to trouble. Double check your facts.

    Like

    • Gus Bailey says:

      Dave, without transmitting what is very likely child pornography across state lines; let’s check facts:

      A boy (cub) scout (represented at an age between eight and twelve) is encouraged/directed by the adult to engage in sexual contact with another scout. Is it fair to say that is the crux of the ‘bit’ within the ‘bit’?

      Liked by 3 people

      • Ashterah says:

        Why yes. Yes it is Gus. And by applying the “I know it when I see it” test, that is child pornography in my book.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Gussy — at what point in the “bit” does the sexual contact begin. Describe it. They talk about it. But do they actually PERFORM THE ACT? Of course not.

        Like

      • Gus Bailey says:

        NM, the key seems to be phrasing to the effect that the young scout should take no discomfort/offence at possible penile/anal penetration. So, yeah; ’round here when an authority figure promotes or encourages a minor to engage in sexual contact, that’s sexual abuse. Technically speaking it may not be “Sexual Offense, 4th Degree” in MD, but I never said it was.

        Liked by 5 people

  16. BS has piss-poor reading comprehension, so it’s not surprising he can’t even see how a normal person would interpret what he’s written.

    Satire is supposed to be of something, and every time he’s tried to show that homophobia is wrong by “satirizing” something, all he does is create a rape fantasy. The DK crowd isn’t exactly known as a bastion of RWNJs and they all interpreted that little piece of his as a man raping his wife/girl friend. I bet they’d say the same thing about the boy scout “satire”, that there is nothing funny about it, and it’s obviously some pervert’s kiddie porn fantasy.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Rob Crawford says:

      I’m beginning to think Cabin Boy’s stage show wasn’t voluntary.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Gus Bailey says:

      LG, I must disagree. Bill has great reading and comprehension, they just aren’t related to one another. He reads what’s on the screen and comprehends what the voices tell him the words say.

      Liked by 4 people

  17. Tao says:

    The Elkridge Horror lacks a few set of initials to be ever taken seriously with regard to the law. Initials such as “J.D.”, “L.L.B.”, “L.L.D.” or even “B.A.” “B.S.”, “M.S.” or “M.A”. Even his partner in insanity, Dr. Deborah Frisch claimed her own “Pee-aitch-dee”. Bill Schmalfeldt has none of these. He claims that he did, however, get up on stage in Japan and cavort sexually with a “tranny”. He also claimed to have assaulted the shores in Beirut with the Marines. More truthfully, he was probably assaulted on the shores of Beirut by the Marines. No one seems to like Bill very much except hardened criminals, misfits and failures in life.

    The few “treatises” that he has signed but not necessarily authored, and they are notable in their scarcity, are his “Pro-Se” court filings which I am confident have the court clerks passing his pleadings amongst one another with humorous notations all to which distill down to one provable fact – Bill Schmalfeldt is remarkable in his ignorance of The Law and is absolutely incompetent in his practice thereof.

    I would suggest that Bill Schmalfeldt “Cease and Desist”……from life altogether.

    Liked by 2 people

    • That lack of initials does seem to really chap his ass. He spends a lot of time denigrating anyone who has those or similar initials, and the rest of it trying to prove that he’s so wonderful that he doesn’t need the initials to be better at whatever field of endeavour is being discussed. He’s better at the law than folks with a JD or LLD. He’s better at writing than folks with degrees in the subject. He’s better at research than folks with degrees in that area. Etc., etc., etc.

      The one think I can’t quite figure is whether he really believes his claims, or he realizes how small he is, and is just trying to make himself feel bigger.

      Liked by 2 people

      • No Longer Interested says:

        He’s trying to be like that guy who says, “I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters.”

        Both are losers

        Liked by 3 people

  18. I’m going to put a few notes here, allow comments for a few days and then lock it up. So, LAST CALL.

    It appears that Bill still objects to the various short hand descriptions of his Scout comedy bit. As far as context, I understand that it is a bit within a bit. He’s telling what he supposes Right Wing Nutjobs think about gays in the scouts. This does not justify the audio I listened to. At no time do I think he recorded a criminal act, acted criminally in recording his bit, or actually harmed children. I called it sick. I stand by my review.

    Schmalfeldt had no other substantive criticism of the article except to make sure everything I write is verifiable. I’m pretty sure I am solid. Be well.

    Liked by 6 people

  19. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Dave, you have every right to dislike the content of what I produced. I respect your opinion. Not everyone has the same taste in comedy. Some folks prefer “Marmaduke”, others prefer “South Park”. Where other people cross the line is in claiming that what I’ve done is criminal. It’s no more criminal than an editorial cartoon retweeted by noted right wing commenter David Barber in which a Boy Scout standing in front of a mincing “obviously” gay scoutmaster says, “Wait a minute, in order to get the merit badge for ‘Tolerance’ I have to do WHAT?” As a person who supports gay rights, I find that offensive. My satire was aimed at the people who THINK that way. If you thought it was tasteless and offensive, I can dig that. All I ask of my critics is that they criticize what I wrote or said, not what they PRETEND I wrote or said. We cool on that point?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Rob Crawford says:

      We do criticize what you write. Then you get all butthurt, delete it, and claim you never wrote it or we don’t get the “context”.

      Now, if you’d just forget any of us exist, and leave everyone alone, all this investigating and criticizing would stop. You have no one to blame for your “pain” but yourself — you stuck your nose into other peoples’ business, remember? Now pull it out and go silent.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        You don’t tell me what to do, Robbie. Criticism is one thing. Blatant lies — quite another. You all stuck your noses into my business before I ever even heard of you. So, tell you what. YOU pull out YOUR noses and go silent, mmmkay?

        Like

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        BTW — In regards to “Paul Krendler’s” family tragedy. I’ve been burned by things posted on his blog that I believed to be true more than once. So, the moment someone verifies that this accident he writes about actually happened, I suppose I will have no choice but to drop my lawsuit against Paul Grady. So, I guess it’s up to Krendler/Grady’s friends to verify whether or not this actually happened, or if this is just another lame attempt to punk me. Otherwise, the case proceeds.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Gus Bailey says:

        Would someone explain why Bill thinks Paul would spoof him to get him to drop the suit against Grady? To prove that Paul’s daughter was in an accident would be relatively easy; except then it would out Paul. Does Bill think we’re that stupid. (forget I asked; projection and all that…)

        Liked by 6 people

      • Pablo says:

        You all stuck your noses into my business before I ever even heard of you.

        That’s bullshit. Blob. You stuck your big fat face into other people’s business:

        If you morons would just forget #brettkimberlin even exists and go about your lives, you would be happier and no one would be investigating.—
        Bill Schmalfeldt (@LiberalGrouch) November 30, 2012

        I’m still wondering. Are YOU happier?

        Liked by 6 people

      • Rob Crawford says:

        “You all stuck your noses into my business before I ever even heard of you.”

        Ya know, I think you actually believe this. It’s a complete lie, but I think you actually believe it.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Kyle Kiernan says:

        False.
        It tried to get Walker to violate the Peace Order Kimberlin got against him which unconstitutionally forbid him from writing about Kimberlin. Walker obeyed that order, despite It’s importunings, until he could get it overturned. And we were all off to the races then.
        Lie.
        Be well or shrivel up and expire, your choice.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Ashterah says:

      No. We won’t go away. We are not “cool.” And your “satire” was in no way comparable to a mincing gay scout master. Not in the slightest. And I’m not a prude by any measure. And yes, what you wrote can be considered criminal in some jurisdictions. Go figure.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Which jurisdictions would those be, sweetie? Let me know, Give me a detailed list so I can turn myself in and receive the punishment I so richly deserve.

        Like

      • Gus Bailey says:

        Ash, I think it’s better if we just let him explain it to the US Marshall’s that come to extradite him to said jurisdictions. ;D

        Liked by 2 people

      • Pablo says:

        Um, there’s something that it’s only fair be explained to the Marshal before he gets there. #FearPee

        Liked by 2 people

  20. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    BTW: as far as Army Fat saying I’ve been up past my bedtime, what IS my bedtime and why is it his business. I point out for the sake of accuracy that my comments show up on this blog as being posted 4 hours later than I post them. For instance, it is actually 12:15 pm EDT right now.

    Like

  21. The time is “off.” I’ll fix it as soon I figure out how.

    All I ask of my critics is that they criticize what I wrote or said, not what they PRETEND I wrote or said. — Bill Schmalfeldt

    That’s fair. In truth, you’ve not exactly asked. You are clearly more calm and respectful here — ignoring the “junior” thing. You have bullied others in real life and on the internet.. You Tweeted using my company’s Twitter account accusing me of commenting on company time/resources, and tweeted to the world my Chapter 13 information, plus a picture of my house. I guess that was supposed to strike fear in my heart — or get me fired. All while knowing full well that I’m not one of the characters calling you names.

    Now, have people made fun of your indelicate posts relating to your wife? Yes, and sometimes they have been insulting. That’s the thing about rock throwing. It’s hard NOT to get hit with something. Have folks mocked your illness? Called you “Shaky?” Yes. Some folks really figure the best way to deal with you is the hardest way. See: Sean Connery in The Untouchables. Out of 6 billion people in the world, you’ve pissed off some creative bastards. If they were on your side, you’d want them helping you.

    I am taking full credit for ALL of my statements, here and elsewhere. All of it is verifiable fact, or fully protected opinion. On the subject of facts: While you threaten, you should realize that the so-called Lickspittles have links and screenshots of LOTS of stuff. You may have forgotten or deleted some posts, but they live on somewhere. Again as you said “not a threat,” but a statement of fact.

    I hope your relative calm on these subjects continues here, and that certain folks can be polite. I am not deleting previous posts above, just to keep historical accuracy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

      That is fair enough, Dave. And I apologize for going nuclear on you. When you’ve been subjected to as much “horse shit” as I have been, you get a little testy. Now, with people like “Grace” calling me hypocritical and evil for daring to offer prayers to “Krendler’s” family — all the while sporting an avatar that shows my wife as a corpse — I think you can see that we’ve clearly gone through the looking glass here.

      I have numerous conservative friends with whom I vehemently disagree on issues, but I value them as people. The folks who throw these things at me do not see me as a person. They see me as if I were the evil “Andre the Giant” instead of the nice, gentle Jean Ferrar he was in real life. These people have created a narrative about me, insist the narrative is true, then behave based on that narrative. And I admit I have been less than successful in countering that.

      But statements like you just made give me hope. I’m certain you were not involved in the attempts to frame me, to mail filth to my house. Broadcaster to broadcaster, I would shake your hand and ask your forgiveness for any slight — real or unintended — just as I offer mine to you.

      But on to other matters — you and I have seen how this “Krendler” person behaves. Every single post has to have something to do with insulting or attacking me or the woman I love. I will offer my prayers to his daughter regardless. And if someone can verify that this accident actually happened, and it’s not just another tasteless prank from “Krendler”, I will have little choice but to drop my lawsuit against Pat Grady.

      Take care.

      Like

      • Pablo says:

        When you’ve been subjected to as much “horse shit” as I have been, you get a little testy.

        More bullshit. It’s what you ALWAYS do and you’ve been doing it for years. You’re a bully, and that’s all you are. Now you’ve run into people who will push you right back, and you want to be a victim.

        Nope. Not happening. You want to be left alone? Leave the field. Go home and don’t come back.

        Liked by 6 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Your voice is muffled by the fact that your head is surrounded by your colon.

        Like

      • Pablo says:

        Ah, more of your anal fixation. Delightful. Remember to wash your hands.

        Your voice is muffled by the fact that you’ve been thrown off Twitter…twice today…and for the umpteenth time. Seems just yesterday you were crowing about what a dirtbag you have to be for that to happen. Today I believe you.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        The colon and anus are distinctly different portions of the lower intestinal tract. The colon is responsible for absorbing the last bits of moisture the body can use from the fecal bolus. The anus is a muscle that relaxes on command to allow the body to expel the waste. And if everyone who thinks Pabsy-Wabsy has his head up his ass has an “anal fixation,” there are a lot of people with anal fixations. Piss off, fat boy.

        Like

      • Pablo says:

        Blob, the entire planet knows about you and your fixation on he butt stuff, and they don’t need me to tell them. (You need an anatomy lesson, though.) And when was the last time you saw the south side of 200 pounds, lardass? You were what, nine? If I ever approach your weight, I’ll shoot myself.

        You keep deflecting from the pertinent question with your incessant asininity: Are YOU happier having stuck your nose into others’ business? How IS that working out for you?

        Liked by 6 people

      • Rob Crawford says:

        Would you fricking watch “The Man Trap”? It’s a salt vampire from the original Star Trek series, not a corpse.

        Liked by 3 people

  22. You know, Bill, being pushed off Twitter might just be a gift. Focus on Gail, not ‘Net H8, and you might find your life improved.

    Liked by 8 people

  23. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    CTP – You might demonstrate the sincerity of your suggestion by changing your avatar.
    Pablo — You guys talk about butt stuff WAY more than I do. Fat Stuff.

    You cats don’t hate me. You don’t KNOW me. You hate the cartoon super villain version of me that was created for you to hate. I forgive you.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Pablo says:

      Blob, you are the world’s greatest oversharer. You never shut up about yourself. Most of what we all know about you, you’ve told us. As for the rest? Well, if you would just forget that (the enormous list of people you’ve harassed) exists, your life would be happier and no one would be investigating.

      Liked by 5 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Enormous list of people who asked for it and got it and found they didn’t like it?

        Like

      • A.B. says:

        Hi Bill!

        ;D

        Liked by 4 people

      • Rob Crawford says:

        How did they “ask for it”, Bill? How did Hoge “ask for it”? How did McCain “ask for it”? I know those two investigated a career criminal, a con-man who likely hired a murder and DID plant a bomb AT A HIGH SCHOOL — and that was your given reason for attacking them.

        YOU ran to the defense of a man who tried to shred children with a bomb. A man who, among his lesser crimes, claimed to sabotage material going to the US military.

        Does that give you ANY idea why we have such a low opinion of you?

        Liked by 6 people

    • Alright, Bill. LETS. PLAY. A. GAME. I switched back to my Col. Jenkins avatar (it might take some time to propagate. I changed it at 2333 hrs your time.) I’ll keep it on Jenkins (or maybe Jessup) as long as you don’t spend excessive amounts of time flinging poo on the net. I accept that you feel you need to address some attacks sometimes. Even if I think you are wrong, I accept that you have that right. BUT- as long as you don’t spend HOURS going back and forth with your “enemies” on the ‘net, as long as you don’t dedicate lengthy podcasts to attacking them, as long as you don’t go on and on with blog posts about how so-and-so “lied” and “libeled” you because of some childish insult, I’ll accept that you are truly focusing on your wife, and I’ll even stop commenting about you, totally. Because, if your (somewhat remarkable) output in this pointless online “war” fades, I’ll know you are truly taking your role as a husband seriously and are providing comfort to Gail. And I would NEVER criticise you for that.

      You see, Bill, I don’t hate you. I really do want you to live to the fullest. I want you to spend every second of it doing the things that the Holy Spirit tells you you should. You can’t possibly live a better life than that.

      If you just completely ignored the “lickspittle” and “Zombie” hordes, if you put your love of Christ, and your love of Gail, ahead of defending your reputation, you would be immensely happier.

      I mess with you because 1) I want to change your behavior by pointing out what you are doing wrong, because I believe that is what is right FOR YOU; 2) I want you to stop attacking innocent people (and, in all honesty, some of your online enemies have earned an attack or two;) 3) Its fun. I wish I could say that I am always primarily motivated by number 1, but I would be lying. Its mostly 3.

      Let me tell you this, sincerely- my wish for you is to live your life to the fullest, to enjoy your relationships with people to the fullest, and to use those relationships with those people to bring the light that is Jesus Christ to every corner of the universe you touch. That would be a life well lived.

      You can have peace, Bill. Its all up to you. And you are going to need that peace if Gail is as sick as you say. You can’t both comfort and minister to her if you spend hours each day recording parody songs about how Paul Krendler likes to have sex with animals,

      Ask God what he wants you to do in this “battle,” and really listen. He’ll tell you its not worth it. And if you believe he told you something different, well- there’s consequences for that.

      Im not going to be sarcastic and say “Be Well.”

      I’ll pray for you and Gail.

      -The Colonel

      Liked by 5 people

  24. Bill Schmalfeldt says:

    Look. You guys win. Hoge got me kicked off of Twitter for having multiple accounts — something he has done himself. Shit, we all have backup accounts, but I am so sick of all of this I am not going to start another one, so I can’t use that to communicate. You have all your little websites to tear me to pieces. Enjoy yourselves.

    I’ve been sitting, just watching Gail sleep for the last half-hour or so. She grimaced, so I woke her up to ask if she was in pain. She didn’t know where she was at first and said something about a pendulum swinging back and forth in front of her. But after about a minute she was lucid and we had a nice chat.

    I hope “Krendler’s” daughter pulls through.

    Those are the things that are important.

    This is not.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Pablo says:

      That’s exactly the right attitude. It’s a shame that it won’t survive the weekend.

      Liked by 5 people

      • I agree with Pablo, that’s a good attitude, and as long as it holds up, Lickspittle and zombie commenting will be restrained or (more likely) non-existant with regards to BS.

        And John’s “multiple accounts” weren’t the problem, and for that matter they weren’t real problem with Bill today. His problem was that he was using both accounts to tag team abuse and libel people he hates. From the Twitter Rules

        Serial Accounts: You may not create multiple accounts for disruptive or abusive purposes, or with overlapping use cases. Mass account creation may result in suspension of all related accounts. Please note that any violation of the Twitter Rules is cause for permanent suspension of all accounts. [my italics and bold]

        I hope that Gail is doing as well as (or better than) can be expected, that she is in no pain, and that her remaining time here, however short or long, is comfortable and comforting for her and her family.

        Liked by 5 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        Here’s what I’d like you to do before the end of the weekend, Pabs. Reach down into your throat until your hand comes out your stinking ass, grab one of your dingleberry encrusted ass hairs and pull yourself inside out. Then, put your rancid cowboy hat back on. You’ll look much better. Fuck you.

        Like

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        And thank you for the prayers. They are greatly appreciated.

        Like

      • Pablo says:

        Boy, did I overestimate your capacity to be anything but an obnoxious, self destructive, anally fixated douchebag! You didn’t last an hour, Blob!

        Très pathetique.

        Liked by 7 people

    • Tao says:

      You got yourself kicked off Twitter!!! Not John Hoge! You used two of your accounts to encourage criminal harassment against John Hoge. As soon as you start accepting responsibility for your own actions and misdeeds, you will find yourself no longer a target and one day perhaps attracting friends. It doesn’t matter who else commits misdeeds….it matters that you do! If you will accept that, then you will truly begin to understand Karma as well,as your place in the Universe.

      Prayers for your wife Gail.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Bill Schmalfeldt says:

        How many accounts did Hoge have when he got me kicked off?

        Like

      • Tao says:

        Thank you for your comment clearly demonstrating just why it is that you are so damn unpopular!

        It doesn’t matter how many accounts John Hoge or Brett Kimberlin or anyone else have. What is of prime importance here is that you, Bill Schmalfeldt, had more than one and actively used two of them to solicit criminal activity against John Hoge. You got caught and are paying the consequences for your illegal behavior. Twitter kicked you off, not John Hoge. You created the factual situation giving Twitter the reason to suspend you. No one else, just YOU!!!

        Grow up!

        Liked by 3 people

      • Rob Crawford says:

        “How many accounts did Hoge have when he got me kicked off?”

        Immaterial, because YOU were the one using multiple accounts to harass someone.

        Again, YOU need to admit that YOUR ACTIONS are why you’ve been kicked off Twitter. Be a man, own the actions you’ve taken and the repercussions for them.

        Liked by 4 people

    • katiescarlet says:

      Multiple accounts? That’s rich.

      You were kicked off Twitter for making threats and being abusive.

      Liked by 5 people

      • And the Twitter TOS is quite clear that having multiple accounts is not, in and of itself, a suspending/banning offense. It’s how you use them that is the problem. One CAN have, e.g., a personal, a professional, and a business account at the same time. It is not OK to bounce back and forth between two or more accounts to harass, abuse, and/or threaten people.

        Liked by 2 people

  25. TwittyBang says:

    Reading through all this, it’s quite clear the Blob still takes zero responsibility for trying to destroy lives, lying about Hoge, posting private info, and the multitude of other heinous things he has done.
    It’s also a sure thing he’ll be back on Twitter in less than a few days. We’ve heard that how many times?
    As for anyone causing him stress, how easily would that be eliminated if he stopped showing up here? What a blowhard. Lying POS.
    Using Gail to elicit sympathy is just icing on the s***-filled cake that is the Blob.
    Anythingncrappy that happens to Bill is brought on by Bill. As for asking that references to Gail cease, it might be considered if Bill apologize for antagonizing Andrew Breitbart’s family after Andrew’s death. I doubt any of us has seen more vile things published online. Bill is a pus-filled, bullying, crap pile with no hope of redemption.

    Liked by 8 people

    • Rob Crawford says:

      Breitbart, Stranahans, Hoges, etc. ad nauseam.

      Liked by 3 people

    • thurberite says:

      Cabin Boy is one of those individuals who honestly believe that karma only hits those he disparages. He ignores the fact that Karma is a bitch. Let me repeat that: Karma is a bitch.
      And deleting online content and shutting down accounts will not keep him from being hit very hard by Karma.

      Liked by 2 people

      • D. Edgren says:

        Indeed, Bill Schmalfeldt’s deletion of those accounts leaves proof, in a legal sense, in the hands of his adversaries. Only a fool would deliberately do that. If he thinks he’s hiding something, there’s multiple independent sources of foundation for the deleted stuff, all under the control of people who don’t agree with Bill very often, if ever. Epic fail.

        Liked by 2 people

  26. Pinwheel says:

    I see when BS is given the chance to address his critics, he craps the bed in new, creative ways.

    Liked by 7 people

  27. D. Edgren says:

    Reach down into your throat until your hand comes out your stinking ass, grab one of your dingleberry encrusted ass hairs and pull yourself inside out. Then, put your rancid cowboy hat back on. You’ll look much better. Fuck you.

    That’ll sound great over at Billt Sez, Bill. When are you going to learn>

    * * * * *

    To Our Gentle Host- Dave, I have spotted the error getting your last name right on several Billy Sez images. Those have been fixed and I humbly apologize for the mistake. You know how to get hold of me- please let me send the corrected images to you at your convenience. Thanks. DRE

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Pingback: I’m Beginning to Think Less Communication Would Be Better | Dave Alexander (formerly ukuleledave)

  29. Pingback: Comedy and Schmalfeldt: Like Bicycles and Fish | Dave Alexander (formerly ukuleledave)

  30. Pingback: I’m Not Being Sued | Dave Alexander & Company — Ukuleledave and David Edgren

Comments are closed.